Where the line runs
I do not write code, build layouts or assemble sites in page builders. Your developer builds the site — I design the part without which it will not be visible in search.
THE STRUCTURE BEFORE ANYONE STARTS BUILDING/
I research demand and design the site: page map, URLs, intents, block structure, headings and meta tags. Building it is your own developer's job.
For anyone commissioning a new site or a redesign who wants the structure settled before the mock-ups
this is usually where it hurts most
I do not write code, build layouts or assemble sites in page builders. Your developer builds the site — I design the part without which it will not be visible in search.
A core of queries for your subject: what people actually search for, which wordings end in an enquiry and which only bring traffic.
A list of every page with its URL, depth and intent: one intent, one address, with no sections competing against each other in the results.
For every page: the order of the blocks and what goes in each, H1, H2 and H3, meta tags, FAQ and calls to action. I write it so the developer and the copywriter do not have to come back with questions.
How the sections connect and the order in which to open them: the first wave for enquiries, the second for reach. The scope is matched to the budget before the work starts, not after.
If the site already exists: what to keep, which URLs to merge with redirects, what to keep out of the index and in what order to move, so that traffic survives the launch.
The price is counted per item: an extra commercial page is $100, an informational one $80. Building the site from the project is the job of your developer.
I don't paper over the absence of a public case with invented results. I show the process and will publish measurable findings once the project is finished and agreed with the client.
No. I do not write code, build layouts or assemble sites in page builders. Your developer or their contractor builds the site — I design the part without which it will not be visible in search: demand, the set of pages, the URLs, the block structure and the briefs for the copy. If you have not chosen a developer yet, the project makes quotes comparable: a contractor prices a defined list of blocks instead of a brief that says only that a website is needed.
A document rather than verbal advice: a site map with URLs and intents, a keyword core split across the pages, and an SEO brief for every page — blocks, headings, meta tags, FAQ, calls to action and internal linking. It is written to be opened by a developer and built from.
Full architecture is from $730: keyword research, the site map, URLs, intents, section hierarchy, block structure, H1, H2 and H3, meta tags, FAQ, calls to action and internal linking. The site map and basic structure alone are from $490, if part of the work is already done.
It is counted from scope: the base project is from $730, then per item — an extra commercial page $100, an informational one $80. The number of pages comes from demand and is fixed before the start, so the estimate does not grow along the way.
That is SEO support for a redesign or migration, from $580: what to keep, which URLs to merge with redirects, what to keep out of the index and in what order to move. If it is not clear what is wrong with the current site, an audit is cheaper first: express $290, full from $580.
Keyword research and clustering, from $340, answers the question of what people search for. Architecture goes further and turns that core into a set of pages: URLs, intents, block content and headings. A core with no such map stays a spreadsheet nobody can build from.
No. Rankings depend on what actually gets built and published, on the age of the domain and on the competition. What I guarantee is a project that removes the predictable causes of invisibility: pages built for real demand, clean URLs, complete meta tags and sections that connect. Promotion after launch is separate work — SEO packages from $490 a month.
Describe the situation. I'll look at the inputs and suggest the shortest route to a result.